Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Genetics and Molecular Research

Volume  7, Issue 1, January- June 2018, Pages 21-24
 

Original Article

Characterization of a Partially Cryptic 3-way Translocation t (8;6;21) (q22.1;q27;q22.3) in AML by Reflex FISH.

Madon Prochi F.1, Shah Samir S.2, Sanap Rupesh R.3, Athalye Arundhati S.4, Lele Hrushikesh M.5, Parikh Rupali S.6, Vaswani Lakshmi P.7, Yargop Mamta V.8, Parikh Firuza R.9

1,3,4,5,9 Department of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, 15, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India. 2Department of Hematology, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, 15, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India and Department of Pathology, Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400007, India. 6,7Department of Pathology, Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400007, India. 8Department of Hematology, Jaslok Hospital and Researc

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijgmr.2319.4782.7118.4

Abstract

Context: Variants of standard translocations in leukemia are occasionally suspected initially by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), due to a different signal pattern. In many cases, this is due to the involvement of an additional chromosome, eading to a complex three-way translocation. If the breakpoints are in the telomeric region, the cryptic translocation may not be visible on karyotyping. We describe here the characterization of a variant AML1/ ETO fusion involving 6q in a patient with AML-M2 Aims: To identify and confirm the extra chromosome involved in a variant AML1/ETO translocation in a case of AML-M2. 

Settings and Design: First routine FISH for AML1/ ETO and conventional karyotyping was carried out. Reflex FISH was set up on previously Giemsabanded metaphases in two rounds to confirm that chromosome 6 was additionally involved in the AML1/ETO translocation. 

Material and Methods: Heparinized bone marrow aspirate was obtained from a suspected case of AML-M2. Cytogenetic analysis by routine FISH for AML1/ETO and conventional karyotyping was carried out. Reflex FISH was set up on Giemsabanded metaphases in two rounds using probes for AML1/ETO followed by CEP 6.

Results: FISH results showed the presence of a variant signal pattern for translocation AML1/ ETO. Karyotyping of Giemsa-banded metaphases showed suspicion of a three way translocation t (8;6;21) (q22.1;q27;q22.2) which was confirmed by reflex FISH analysis.

Conclusions: In cases with suspicion of a cryptic three way translocation, reflex FISH on previously Giemsa-banded metaphases gives a clue about the additional partner chromosome which can be different in each case.

 


Keywords : Reflex FISH, Three-waytranslocation, AML1/ETO, cryptic translocation
Corresponding Author : Prochi F. Madon, Genetics Lab, 6th Floor, Dept. of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, 15, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India.