Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior

Volume  1, Issue 2, Jul-Dec 2015, Pages 91-100
 

Original Article

Rights of Differently Abled Persons in India: A Comparative Analysis of UNCRPD and Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill 2014

Aparna Singh, Sony Singh

*Assistant Professor Law, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow-226012. **LL.M, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (Central) University Lucknow-226025

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI:

Abstract
India is a signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of Person with Disability (UNCRPD).The three important obligations arises out of the convention namely, implementation of provisions of UNCRPD, harmonization of Indian Laws with UNCRPD and preparation of a country report by 2010. Critical analysis  of the Right of  Persons with Disabilities Bill,2014 and taking into consideration the extent of compliance and  with the obligations imposed by UN Convention on rights of persons with disabilities thereby, reflecting the substantive contribution of the convention to disability law in India. While disability rights are at this nascent stage, both as legal and academic concepts, the need to strengthen and deepen our understanding of the disability agenda is urgent, especially, if we are to strategically promote disabled peoples’ distinctive needs and experiences within the broader equality debate [1]. At the same time that the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 was enacted in Britain, the PWD Act came into force in India from 1 January 1996. Prior to this, disability-related discrimination was never addressed in India either in the Constitution under Chapter III, which contains the fundamental rights, or by any other statute. The Constitution, while protecting equality under Articles 14, 15, and 16, does not include disability as one of the categories for non-discrimination. The only mention of protection of persons facing disability and sickness was made in the Directive Principles of State Policy in Chapter IV of the Constitution (there is no guarantee from the State to prevent discrimination due to disability)[2]. The present Right of Persons with Disabilities Bill, 2014 and PWD Act was itself an outcome of India’s obligations as a signatory to the Proclamation on the Full Participation and Equality of People with Disabilities in the Asia and Pacific Region, adopted at the meeting to launch the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons 1993-2002, convened by the Economic and Social Commission for Asian and Pacific Region, held at Beijing from 1 to 5 December 1992. Therefore, the CRPD would also give impetus for a review and amendment of the PWD Act and Right of Person with Disability Bill, 2014 to incorporate its new principles and requirements. Fundamental rights such as the right to education and the right to employment and livelihood that essentially stem from the right to life guaranteed in Article 21 do not specifically address disability related issues. It is only in the Directive Principles of State Policy under Article 39A & 41 that disability is briefly mentioned [3]. These principles direct the State through this article to make effective provisions for securing the right to work, to education, and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness disablement. Justice Sinha notes that even the provisions of Article 41 should be implemented in consonance with the complementary principles of non-discrimination and reasonable differentiation [4]. Article 39A imposes upon the State a duty to ensure that “opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities”. 5The only legislation enacted prior to the PWD Act and Right of Persons with Disabilities Bill, 2014, which covered persons with disabilities, was the Mental Health Act of 1987. This Act does not address the issues of legal capacity and rights of persons with mental disabilities, but only provides for their guardianship and institutionalization and, therefore, cannot be considered as a legislation addressing disability-based discrimination. Persons with disability were included in welfare schemes and were referred to as ‘physically handicapped’ or ‘PH’. Token affirmative measures were taken by the State in reserving posts in government services that is civil services legislations, purely as welfare measures and not as antidiscrimination measures. However, this was very limited and the extent of reservation for persons with disability was not uniform throughout the country.  In this context, the enactment of the PWD Act is remarkable because for the first time in India since 1995, social and economic rights of persons with disability have been addressed by any statute. One can say that it has the potential to probably become India’s first anti-discrimination law, or in the words of Fredman, an ‘equality law’.6

Keywords: Differently Abled Persons; PWD; UNCRPD; Disability; Discrimination; Institutionalization etc. 


Corresponding Author : Aparna Singh