Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
International Journal of Practical Nursing

Volume  7, Issue 2, May-August 2019, Pages 83-93
 

Original Article

A Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Helfer Skin Tapping Technique Versus Direct Digital Pressure on Intensity of Pain Prior to Intramuscular Injection among Patients Admitted in Selected Hospitals of the City

Puthiyavettil Caesar Philip1, Lata Sukare2, Pascaline David3

1M.Sc. Nursing 2Professor and Head 3Associate Professor, Department Medical Surgical Nursing, VSPM’s College of Nursing and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Hingna Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440019, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijpn.2347.7083.7219.5

Abstract

Background: Intramuscular injection is the injection of a substance directly into a muscle. It is a common practice in modern medicine. In India, approximately 6 billion injections are given every year. Painful injection incites severe fear, which may lead a patient to delay seeking medical help. Nurses have ethical and legal obligations to mitigate injection-related pain and the nurses' use of effective pain management not only provides physical comfort to the patients, but also improves the patients' experience. Objective: To assess the intensity of pain after Helfer skin tapping technique among patients receiving intramuscular injection. To assess the intensity of pain after direct digital pressure among patients receiving intramuscular injection. To compare between the intensity of pain after Helfer skin tapping technique and direct digital pressure among patients receiving intramuscular injection. To associate the intensity of pain with selected demographic variables. Methodology: In the present study, quantitative approach is used. Research design was true experimental post test only design. Probability simple random sampling technique using lottery method was used. Sample size was 60 adult patients [(30 in Helfer skin tapping technique (Group I) and 30 in Direct digital pressure (Group II)]. Result: Analysis reveals that in Group I mean score is 2.80 and in Group II mean score is 4.30. Unpaired ‘t’ test was used. Calculated ‘t’ value is 6.739 which is higher than tabulated ‘t’ value at 5% level of significance. Hence the research hypothesis H1 is accepted and null hypothesis H0 is rejected. Conclusion: The study concludes that there is a significant difference between mean pain score of patients who receive Helfer skin tapping technique (Group I) and those who receive Direct digital pressure (Group II). Hence based on the above cited findings it was concluded that Helfer skin tapping technique (Group I) is more effective than Direct digital pressure (Group II) for reducing intensity of pain among patients receiving intramuscular injection. Also, in both groups there is significant association of intensity of pain with Body Mass Index.

Keywords: Comparative; Assess; Effectiveness; Helfer Skin Tapping Technique; Direct Digital Pressure; Intensity of Pain; Intramuscular Injection; Patients.


Corresponding Author : Lata Sukare