Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2019, Pages 1889-1893
 

Original Article

Comparison of Clonidine with Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic Agent in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Aparna Sharma1, Abhishek Sharma2, Anupam Sharma3, Ajay Sood4, Girish Sharma5, Abhishake Thakur

1Associate Professor 4Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171001, India. 2Senior Resident, Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, UN Mehta Institute of Cardiology, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380016, India. 3Assistant Professor 5Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar Government Medical College and Hospital Nahan, Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh, 173001, India. 6Senior Resident, Department of Neuroanesthes

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6619.2

Abstract

Introduction: Addition of adjuvant to local anesthetic in supraclavicular brachial plexus block helps in rapid onset, increased duration of block and improved quality of analgesia. We compare clonidine and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: Sixty ASA Grade I/II patients undergoing upper limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Two groups of 30 patients each and randomly assigned using computer generated random numbers. The patients were compared for onset as well as duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia and hemodynamic side effects. Group C: Bupivacaine 0.25% (35 cc) + clonidine 1 μg/kg; Group D: Bupivacaine 0.25% (35 cc) + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Results: The onset of sensory block was shorter in dexmedetomidine group (statistically highly significant) as additive to bupivacaine compared to clonidine. Although no significant difference was seen in onset of motor block, the duration of sensory block and motor block was significantly prolonged in the dexmedetomidine group than in clonidine group. There was significant less rescue analgesia demanded by patients of dexmedetomidine group with no significant difference in block quality in both the groups. Conclusion: From the present study, it can be concluded that, dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and enhances the quality of block as compared with clonidine when used as an adjuvant to in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Clonidine; Bupivacaine; Supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Corresponding Author : Anupam Sharma