Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 5, September-October 2019, Pages 1779-1783
 

Original Article

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Buprenorphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Femur Interlocking Surgeries

Pradeep R1, Dhananjeyulu P2

1Associate Professor, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh 517127, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6519.41

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine is administered routinely for lower limb surgeries along with additives for better hemodynamics, prolonged sensory and motor blockade. Most commonly used additives being opiods. In the present study non-opiod like dexmedetomidine is compared with buprenorphine as an adjuvant for bupivacaine in patients undergoing femur interlocking nailing surgeries. Materials and Methods: In the present randomized controlled prospective double-blinded study a total of 90 patients from either gender, aged 20–60 years of ASA I and II undergoing femur interlocking nailing surgeries under spinal anesthesia were included. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 45 each) by closed envelope technique. Patients in Group B received 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 45 μg of buprenorphine, and Group D received 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5 μg dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia. The duration of motor and sensory blockade, time to first analgesic requirement and any adverse events were recorded. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test for categorical data and analysis of variance for continuous data. The value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In our study the subjects in Group D (dexmedetomidine) group had significantly longer period of motor blockade (190 ± 18.2 min) and sensory blockade (145 ± 20.2 min) compared to Group B (120 ± 17.2, 102 ± 13.5) respectively, which is statistically significant (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05* respectively). The time to first request of analgesic in the postoperative period was also longer (200 ± 21.9 min) in dexmedetomidine group when compared with Group B (130 ± 20), (p < 0.05*). There were no untoward complications (hypotension, sedation) in any groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine (5 μg) with bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia gives significantly longer duration of sensory and motor blockade than intrathecal buprenorphine (45 μg) with bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Buprenorphine; Femurinterlocking; Spinal anesthesia; Bupivacaine.
Corresponding Author : Dhananjeyulu P