Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 4, July-August 2019, Pages 1083-1089
 

Original Article

Randomized Control Trial Using Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia with and without Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Abhishek MS1, Vinay Kumar PV2

1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka 572107, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.4

Abstract

Introduction: Commonly we use 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia. Adjuvants to spinal anaesthesia have been used to improve quality of analgesia and in prolongation of anaesthetic duration. Dexmedetomidine has been studied and shown to have synergism with bupivacaine and other local anesthetics. Recently, in a few studies, intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine has been shown to improve analgesic quality. In this study we aimed at finding the efficacy of (IV) dexmedetomidine in improving the analgesia quality and duration of subarachnoid blockade in our hospital scenario. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients were divided into two groups of 45 each. In Group A - 3.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was used for spinal anesthesia. In Group B - 3.5 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia, thirty minutes later a loading dose of IV dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/Kg was infused over 30 min followed by maintenance dose of 0.3 mcg/kg/hr IV dexmedetomidine infused till the end of surgery. In Group A, isotonic saline was used instead of dexmedetomidine preparation. Duration of motor block, sensory block, analgesia, hemodynamic changes, sedation levels, complications and side effects were noted and compared between the study groups in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Results: The duration of motor block in Group A was 149.38 ± 21.32 minutes vs.189.13 ± 31.18 minutes in Group B (p< 0.05), duration of sensory block in Group A was 166.79 ± 33.12 minutes vs. 248.13 ± 48.32 minutes in Group B (p< 0.05), and duration of analgesia in Group A was 198.69 ± 41.38 minutes vs. 298.57 ± 34.65 minutes in Group B (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Use of IV dexmedetomidine improves analgesia quality and prolongs anaesthesia duration in subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine without any hemodynamic instability and with optimum sedation.


Keywords : Spinal anaesthesia; Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; Postoperative analgesia.
Corresponding Author : Vinay Kumar PV