Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 3, May - June 2019, Pages 929-935
 

Original Article

Comparative Study of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine v/s Midazolam as a Premedication in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Jigisha Pujara1, Hitendra Kanzariya2, Visharad Trivedi3, Amit Mishra4, Ankit Chauhan5, Avani Shah6.

1Associate Professor, 2,6Senior Resident, 3Assistant Professor, 52nd year Resident, Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, 4Professor, Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Center, (Affiliated to B. J. Medical College), New Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380016, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.34

Abstract

Background: Intranasal midazolam is a novel technique for administering premedication in children. It has been shown to be more effective than parental presence or placebo in reducing anxiety and improving patient’s compliance at induction of anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is selective 2 agonist with sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic properties with favorable pharmacokinetics. We designed this prospective randomized double-blinded study to compare the safety and efficacy of midazolam and dexmedetomidine administered intranasally as premedication in children undergoing cardiac surgery for CHD. Method: Sixty-two children belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were divided into two groups by standard randomization technique. Patients belonging to group M received intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg whereas patients in group D received intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µgm/kg 30 min prior to surgery in an adequately monitored condition. Patient’s sedation score, behaviour scores, attitude, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, intravenous cannula acceptance and face mask acceptance at the time of induction were studied by an observer till induction of anesthesia. Results: There was no significant difference in sedation score in both the groups except at 20 minutes, when it was significantly lower in patients belonging to Group D as compared to those of Group M. There was no significant difference inheart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2, behavior score, parental separation acceptance, behavior at separation and level of sedation atinduction of anaesthesia between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the number of patients with a change of behaviour (6.4% v/s 34.4%) and change of sedation (7.1% v/s 37.5%) in Group M and Group D respectively. Patients inGroup M were calmer and allowed face mask application at the time of induction of anesthesia. Conclusion: Intranasal route is safe and effective for administering both, midazolam and dexmedetomidine as premedication in children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease. However, we observed better behaviour with midazolam at induction of anesthesia.


Keywords : Intranasal midazolam; Intranasal Dexmedetomidine; Cardiac Surgery.
Corresponding Author : Hitendra Kanzariya