Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 3, May-June 2019, Pages 777-782
 

Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Sedation Score and Anxiolysis Level in Intranasal and Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Children

Carolin Von Mullai1, Sathisha Kumar2, Saravana kumar S.3

1Senior Assistant Professor, Institute of Anaesthesiology And Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600003, India. 2Senior Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641018, India. 3Senior Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.12

Abstract

 Introduction: Preoperative anxiety in children leading to postoperative negative changes and long-term behavioral problems needs better preanesthetic sedation. Across the world, midazolam is the most commonly used premedicant in pediatric patients. The fact that no single route has achieved universal acceptance for its administration suggests that each route has its own merits and demerits. Aim of the Study: This study compares oral midazolam syrup and intranasal midazolam spray as painless and needleless systems of drug administration for preanesthetic sedation in children. Materials and Methods: The study was in Government Stanley hospital Chennai. Period of the study was between 2012-2013. Seventy pediatric patients belonging to ASA physical status I & II scheduled for elective minor surgical procedures were included in the study. Children belonged to the age group of 2 to 8 years of both sexes. The children were randomly allocated into 2 groups with 35 patients in each group. (Group N & Group O). Demographic data including age, weight, and sex of the children were recorded. The children were given premedication 30 minutes before surgery orally or nasally. The reaction of the children to the premedication was noted. Group – N – received intranasal midazolam at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg using. Insideatomizer midazolam Nasal spray containing 100 microliters/ metered dose which delivers 0.5 mg/dose. Results: The median behavior score and sedation score were further analyzed with the children divided into different age groups age 2–5 and age 7–9yr. The median behavior scores at baseline, at separation from a parent, and at induction were not different among the children from groups N and 0 in all age groups. The median sedation scores of group D were significantly different from group M at separation from parent and at induction in children of age 2–5 yr. In age Group 2–5 yr, the median sedation scores at separation from the parent were 6 and 2 from group N and 0 respectively (p - 0.001). For the same age group, the median sedation scores at induction of anesthesia were 6 and 2 for group N and 0, respectively (p - 0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, Intranasal midazolam when used as premedication in children, in a dose of 0.2 mg/kg hasa more rapid onset of action with satisfactory sedation and anxiolysis than oral midazolam. The rapid onset of action of nasal midazolam makes it an ideal route for premedication in children.


Keywords : Sedation Score, Anxiolysis Level, Intranasal Midazolam, Oral Midazolam
Corresponding Author : Sathisha Kumar K