Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 1, Jan-Feb 2019, Pages 144-150
 

Original Article

The Evaluation of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Alternative to Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Sonal Gohel1, Sandhya MK2

1Former Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat 395001, India. 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kanachur Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka 575018, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6119.20

Abstract

Context: Proseal laryngeal mask airway is a supraglottic airway device with an additional drainage tube and a dorsal cuff which provides a better seal and prevents aspiration. Aims: 1) to compare the efficacy of PLMA with standard intubation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods and Material: After approval from the institutional ethical committee a prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in sixty ASA class 1 and 2 patients. After induction Proseal LMA was introduced in group P and endotracheal tube was introduced in group E. Details of insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and ventilatory performance were recorded. During surgery, oxygenation and ventilation variables were adjusted to maintain SpO2 > 95% and EtCO2< 45 mmHg. Statistical analysis used: Data was analyzed using the computer statistical software system Openness (open source epidemiological statistics for public health). The two-tailed student's t-test for unequal variance was used for intergroup comparisons except where specified. Probability values p < 0.05 were considered significant and p < 0.001 were considered highly significant. Results: There was no failed insertion of devices. The mean time of insertion of Proseal (80+43.56 seconds) was greater than conventional intubation (23+17.71 seconds). The difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in oxygen saturation (SpO2) or end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) between the two groups before or during peritoneal insufflation. There was no case of inadequate ventilation, regurgitation, or aspiration recorded. Conclusions: Proseal provides a safe alternative to endotracheal intubation for airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 


Keywords : Proseal LMA; supraglottic airway device; alternative to endotracheal intubation. 
Corresponding Author : Sandhya M K