Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  4, Issue 2, April - June 2017, Pages 191-196
 

Original Article

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Opioid Requirement in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Bhavna Kakkar*, Sabih Ahmad**, Pavan Gurha***, Lalit Gupta****, Anish Gupta*****

*Senior Resident ****Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesia, Maulana Azad Medical College & Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi. **Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, BL Kapoor Hospital, New Delhi.***HOD, Department of Anaesthesia, Batra Hospital and

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4217.2

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery poses a challenge to its successful anesthetic management due to its significant alteration of hemodynamics resulting from pneumoperitoneum. Dexmedetomidine although frequently used in laparoscopic surgeries produces sedation, analgesia and anxiolysis, alongwith decreasing heart rate and blood pressure. We intended this study to use a lower loading dose of 0.6 µg/kg and maintenance dose of 0.3 µg/kg/h dexmedetomidine so as to utilize its wonderful properties without causing the adverse effects of hypotension and bradycardia, which are common at its usual loading dose of 1 µg/kg and also to study its opioid sparing effect. Methodology: A double blinded randomised placebo controlled trial was conducted on sixty adult patients, ASA grade I or II of either sex, aged 18 to 60 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups who received dexmedetomidine and normal saline and intraoperative hemody­namicswere studied at different time­points. Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to mean duration of surgery (46.67±4.35 vs 47.43±3.96), mean extubation time (6.77 ± 0.73 vs 7.00 ± 0.58), and response to oral commands (8.59 ± 0.7 vs 8.78 ± 0.72). Mean heart rate and blood pressure variations were significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group at all time­points. Fentanyl requirement and post­operative nausea/vomiting was also significantly less in dexmedetomidine group and none patient had any episode of bradycardia, hypotension or hypertension. Conclusion: Dexmedeto­midine 0.6 µg/kg followed by maintenance of 0.3 µg/kg/h provides perioperative hemodynamic stability, facilitates smooth emergence from anesthesia, has opioid sparing properties and reduces post op nausea and vomiting.


Keywords : Opioid; Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamics; Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Corresponding Author : Bhavna Kakkar*