Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal

Volume  15, Issue 4, October-December 2022, Pages 147 -155
 

Original Article

To Study the Immediate of Myofascial Decompression Cupping Therapy and Conventional Stretching on Hamstring Tightness and Balance in Physiotherapy Students: A Comparative Study

Amit S. Patel1, Tanzeem Dhamdachhawala2, Sonali Patel3, Bhargavi Patel4

1Principal, 2-4Intern, College of Physiotherapy, M. B. Gohil Instiitute of Medical Science and Research Center, Navsari 396445, Gujarat, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/potj.0974.5777.15422.1

Abstract

Myofascial decompression (MFD), or cupping therapy and Conventional stretching are common techniques utilized to improve hamstring tightness and balance. MFD is a negative pressure soft tissue treatment technique using suction to manipulate the skin and underlying soft tissues. Stretching is also usually incorporated as pre-exercise as it has been suggested to improve muscle flexibility, prevent muscle injury and enhance physical performance. Purpose of the Study: Aim of this study was to assess whether Myofascial Decompression or Conventional Stretching techniques was more reliable in improving hamstring flexibility and balance improvement in Physiotherapy students.

Method: The present study was conducted in M.B Gohil Institute of Medical Science and Research Center, Navsari, Gujarat. The study includes 50 physiotherapy students divided into two groups using convenient sampling who have age between 18-25 years. One group undergone MFD technique and the other group undergone conventional stretching, the study was conducted for only one day. The AKET was performed before and after the treatment to observe the improvement in range of motion and hamstring flexibility, likewise the SEBT was performed before and after the treatment to observe the improvement in balance.

Outcome Measures: Active knee extension test (AKET) and Star excursion balance test (SEBT). Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 26 software.

Results: The study was done among 50 students, in which 25 students have undergone the MFD technique and the other 25 were undergone the conventional stretching technique. The hamstring muscle flexibility increased in both groups i.e., 2.55% in the cupping group and 2.49% in the stretching group. So, both techniques are very effective to relieve hamstring tightness. The balance improves in each direction of both the groups i.e., anterior, anteromedial, medial, posteromedial, posterior, posterolateral, lateral, and anterolateral. So, both techniques are equally effective to improve balance.

Conclusion: This study indicates that both techniques are very effective to improve hamstring tightness. Here, the myofascial decompression technique has slightly better improvement How to cite this article: Amit S. Patel, Tanzeem Dhamdachhawala, Sonali Patel, et al./To Study the Immediate of Myofascial Decompression Cupping Therapy and Conventional Stretching on Hamstring Tightness and Balance in Physiotherapy Students: A Comparative Study/ Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal. 2022;15(4): 147-155. result than conventional stretching, but it is not significant enough to state that MFD is far better than Conventional stretching. Considering the limitation of MFD is a very good alternative with similar results on hamstrings according to our research.


Keywords : Keywords: Hamstring tightness; Active knee extension test (AKET); Star excursion test (SEBT); Myofascial decompression (MFD); Conventional stretching
Corresponding Author : Amit S. Patel, Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, M. B. Gohil Instiitute of Medical Science and Research Center, College of Physiotherapy, Navsari 396445, Gujarat, India.