Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
New Indian Journal of Surgery

Volume  9, Issue 5, Sep-Oct 2018, Pages 579-586
 

Original Article

A Prospective Comparative Randomized Study between Stapled and Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy

Anil Kumar Sharma1, Satyaveer Singh2, Rekha Porwal3, Amit Singh4, Mukesh Kumar5, Pema Ram Khichar6

1,4Assistant Professor 2,5,6Post Graduate Resident 3Professor, Department of General Surgery, J.L.N Medical College, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.9518.7

Abstract

Aims & Objectives: In the present study we have compared between recent stapled  haemorrhoidectomy  and conventional haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan Technique) for treatment of haemorrhoids in terms of operating time, postoperative pain and bleeding and other complications, hospital stay and time to return  to work. Materials & Methods: This is a prospective comparative study conducted in the department of general surgery of J.L.N.Medical College, Ajmer, Rajasthan in the duration of November 2015 to December 2017. Sixty (60) patients of age>20 years with symptomatic internal hemorrhoids of 3rd & 4th degree were randomly assigned to either conventional or stapled haemorrhoidectomy (30 in each group). Visual analog scale was used for evaluation of pain. Intraoperative blood loss, procedure time, postoperative pain and other complications like urine retention, bleeding, infection, constipation and recurrence rate were studied. Postoperative hospital stay duration, days required to resume normal bowel habits and normal daily activities and satisfaction with treatment. Follow up was done at 1 week, 1 month and 3 month. Data collected and analyzed. Results: Intra-operative blood loss (70.33 v/s 30.33 ml, p value<0.01), duration of surgery (32.8 v/s 27.1 minutes, p value <0.01), post operative pain (p value <0.01) and hospital stay (2.2 v/s 1.0 days, p value<0.001) were less in stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Earlier normal bowel habits (3.6 v/s 2.2 days, p value <0.01) and earlier resumption of normal personal activities (5.6 v/s 4.2 days value <0.001) and better patient satisfaction  (53.33% v/s 93.33%, p value < 0.001) were associated with stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Results regarding post operative complications like bleeding, urinary retention, infection and constipation were no statistical difference found (p value >0.05). Conclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy procedure is superior to conventional haemorrhoidectomy in terms of intra operative blood loss, operative time, post-operative pain, first defecation, early resumption of activity, hospital stay and patient‘s satisfaction. Regarding anal stenosis and recurrence rate long term follow-up is necessary. 

Keywords: Anal Stenosis; Haemorrhoids; Post Operative Complications; Recurrence; Urinary Retention.  

 


Corresponding Author : Amit Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, J.L.N Medical College Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001, India