Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
International Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery

Volume  11, Issue 4, October-December 2019, Pages 269-276
 

Original Article

Comparison of Ramosetron and Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients on Preoperative Steroids Undergoing Supratentorial Craniotomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

Hassan Rashid1, Obaid Ahmad Siddiqui2, Shahna Ali3, Zikrullah Zikrullah4, Manazir Athar5

1,4Senior Resident, 2,3,5Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, (Aligarh Muslim University), Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh 202001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijnns.0975.0223.11419.1

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic ramosetron with ondansetron in preventing PONV after elective supratentorial craniotomy in adult patients on preoperative steroids. Methods: A total of 145 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II patients aged 30–50 years on preoperative steroids scheduled to undergo elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. A standard anesthesia regimen was followed in all patients. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive ondansetron (4 mg/2 ml; Group O), or ramosetron (0.3 mg/2 ml; Group R) intravenously (IV) at the time of dural closure. The incidence of PONV, need for rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics and any adverse events were recorded up to 48 hours postoperatively. Results: During 0–24 hours after surgery, complete response (no PONV) was observed in 30 patients of the ondansetron group and in 34 patients of the ramosetron group (p > 0.05). Complete response i.e., no PONV between 24–48 hours after surgery was observed in 31 patients of the ondansetron group and in 45 patients of the ramosetron group and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). During 0–24 hours, PONV requiring rescue antiemetics were comparable in both the groups, whereas between 24–48 hours PONV requiring rescue antiemetics was higher in ondansetron group (18 patients) as compared to ramosetron group (8 patients) and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Ramosetron was more efficacious than ondansetron in preventing delayed PONV (24–48 hours) in patients on preoperative steroids following supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia. However, both the drugs were comparable in preventing early PONV (0–24 hours). The incidence of side effects was similar in ondansetron and ramosetron.

Keywords: Ondansetron; Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); Ramosetron; Supratentorial craniotomy.


Corresponding Author : Obaid Ahmad Siddiqui