Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Journal of Orthopedic Education

Volume  4, Issue 3, Sep-Dec 2018, Pages 115-119
 

Original Article

Study on Surgical Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

Pawan Kumar

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Orthopaedics; Hi-Tech Medical College, Rourkela, Odisha 769004, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/joe.2454.7956.4318.2

Abstract

  Introduction: Fractures of the clavicle constitute 2.6% of all fractures, account for 44% of the injuries around the shoulder girdle, approximately 70-80% of which occur in the middle third. Even when significantly displaced traditionally these fractures are treated without surgery. Conservative treatments either by sling/figure of 8 bandage/clavicular brace is favored by patients, but the results are much inferior to what reported previously. Present study conducted to operate fresh fracture with displacement >2cm, non-union by ORIF with locking plate with or without bone grafting. Objective is relief from pain, restoration of activities as far as possible & better cosmetic appearance. Material & methods: 28 cases of clavicle in healthy active individuals between 16-65 yrs. of age operated between Dec. 2012 to September 2016 in Hi-Tech Medical College, Rourkela, Odisha. Fracture classified by Allman in to three groups as middle 1/3rd, distal 1/3rd, medial 1/3rd. Indications for surgery either opens, vascular injuries, initial displacement >2cm, nonunion, cosmetically conscious patients. Results: 15 cases of fresh, 6 cases of symptomatic delayed union and 7 cases of nonunion operated with precontoured plate with or without bone grafting. The average hospital stay was 3-7 days. The average time of fracture union was 10 weeks (8-12 weeks). Patients were followed weekly up to 4 weeks and then after 2 and 6 months. The functional outcome according to Constant and Murley score is excellent in 17 patients (60.7%), good in 10 patients (35.7%) and satisfactory in 01 case (3.6%). There was no major complication, 1 patient had superficial infection, deep infection in 1 case, nonunion in 1 case and plate breakage in 1 patient. Results were compared with cases treated conservatively. 

Conclusion: In present era of competition, cosmesis and advancement with least morbidity & excellent results is required. ORIF in selected cases is a very good option in comparison to accept morbidity, cosmetic disfigurement and below average functional results. 

Keywords: Osteosynthesis; Symptomatic; Non-Union; Fracture; Clavicle. 


Corresponding Author : Pawan Kumar, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Orthopaedics; Hi-Tech Medical College, Rourkela, Odisha 769004, India.