Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  7, Issue 12, December 2018, Pages 1255-1257
 

Original Article

Comparison of the Fluorescent Method and Conventional Ziehl–Neelsen Method in the Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in Lymphnode Aspirates

Rushika Patel1, Toral Jivani2, Ashwini Shukla3, Ankita Jetani4

13nd Year Resident, 2Assistant professor, 3Professor (Additional), 43rd Year Resident, Department of Pathology, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education & Research, Surat, Gujarat 395101, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.71218.13

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health problem in developing countries. The most common presentation of extrapulmonary TB is peripheral lymphadenopathy. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a most useful procedure in the evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy as a possible noninvasive alternative to excisional biopsy. Aims and Objectives: To compare the result of conventional ZN method with fluorescent method of detection of acid-fast bacilli in lymph node aspirate and to study the efficacy and advantages of using fluorescent stain for detection of acid-fast bacilli in lymph node cytology. Material and Methods: FNAC was performed in 227 cases of lymphadenopathypresented to the department of Pathology, SMIMER, Surat. Routine cytology, conventional ZN method and fluorescent method were performed on aspirated smears. The advantages of the fluorescent method over the conventional ZN method was analyzed. Results: Out of 227 aspirates, 16 were excluded from the study due to diagnosis of malignancy and 211 cases were evaluated. Among the 211 aspirates, 56.87% (120/211) were positive for AFB on the conventional ZN method, while the smear positivity increased to 65.40% (138/211) on the fluorescent method. Conclusions: Fluorescent microscopy is speedy and easy method of screening, and it reduces observer fatigue. The fluorescent method has more advantages than conventional ZN method. The fluorescent method has higher bacillary positivity rates as compare to conventional ZN method. Hence, the fluorescent method can be used with routine cytology for the identification of AFB. 

Keywords: Cytology; Fluorescent Method; Tuberculosis; Ziehl– Neelsen Stain. 


Corresponding Author : Toral Jivani, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pathology, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education & Research, Surat, Gujarat 395101, India.