Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Cancer Education and Research

Volume  5, Issue 1, January - June 2017, Pages 9-12
 

Original Article

Weekly Versus Three-Weekly Cisplatin in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cancers: A Prospective Study

Najah Mohamed Nizam*, Krishna Sharan**, Anshul Singh***, Prahlad H. Yathiraj***, S. Anusha Reddy****, Donald J. Fernandes*****, M.S. Vidyasagar*****

*Junior Resident **Associate Professor ***Assistant Professor ****Senior Resident *****Professor, Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijcer.2321.9815.5117.2

Abstract

 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) is often used as definitive treatment for patients with locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cancers (HNSCC). Concurrent cisplatin administered 3- weekly (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22 and 43 of RT) is the accepted standard-of-care, but causes significant toxicity. This has resulted in altered administration schedules, including weekly (40mg/m2 ) regimen, with conflicting reports on identifying optimal schedule. We compared acute toxicity and response rates between patients on CT-RT receiving weekly and 3-weekly cisplatin in this prospective study. 56 patients received either weekly (40 mg/m2 ; 36 patients) or 3-weekly (100 mg/m2 ; 20 patients) cisplatin concurrently with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (70 Gy/35#/7 weeks) based on physician or patient preference. Patients receiving weekly schedule were older (57.9 vs 50.3 years; p=0.03), but the groups were comparable in other variables including gender, primary site and stage. Acute toxicities (myelosuppression, mucositis, dysphagia, weight loss, etc.) were frequent but similar betweengroups, excepting a significantly lower nausea/vomiting in weekly schedule (grade II in 8.3% vs. 50%; p=0.03). Two patients, both on weekly chemotherapy, expired of aspiration pneumonia during treatment. Complete response rates at 12 weeks were similar between the cohorts (77.7% vs 85% CR, respectively; p= 0.61). At median follow-up of 12 months (range: 4-21.5 months), the estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between regimens (72% and 78% at 15 months, respectively; p= 0.550). We conclude thatweekly-cisplatin is associated with lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, but has otherwise comparable acute toxicity profile to 3-weekly schedule. Response to treatment and DFS are similar between the two.

Keywords: Sensitizer Chemotherapy; Oral Cancers; Definitive Radiotherapy; Acute Toxicity; Treatment Compliance.


Corresponding Author : Krishna Sharan**