Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  8, Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2021, Pages 557-561
 

Original Article

Comparison of Transdermal and Intravenous Diclofenac in Acute Post-operative Pain in Intertrochanteric Fractures

Manisha 1 , Abhinav Sinha 2 , Sashi Aier 3

1 Senior Resident, Department of Anesthesia, 2 Associate Professor, 3 Senior Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi 110001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.8621.81

Abstract

Introduction: Early mobilization is the primary goal after operation of hip fracture in the elderly wherein the main impediment despite adequate fixation being surgical site pain. Prolonged post-operative recumbency due to pain could lead to various complications like venous thrombosis and cardio-pulmonary compromise. Over enthusiastic use of NSAIDs or opioids on the other hand can have its own set of complications. Hence this study was carried out to evaluate effectivity and safety profile of a commonly used drug, diclofenac via transdermal route in comparison to iv diclofenac.

Methods: 30 patients meeting the study criteria were alternatively allocated to either groups of IV diclofenac and TD diclofenac. All patients were informed how to monitor post-operative pain on a VAS scale at 2,4,6 and 12 hour intervals. Group TD was applied Trans Dermal Diclofenac 100 mg patch, 1 hour prior to surgery and repeated at 12 hourly intervals. Group IV was given intravenous diclofenac 75 mg 1 hour prior to end of surgery and repeated at 12 hourly intervals. First rescue analgesic used was Intra Venous (IV) Paracetamol, if VAS was more than 6, if administered Its dosage and timing of administration was noted. IV tramadol was kept as a standby rescue analgesic.

Results: both the groups were comparable with regards to age and ASA scores. Time to first rescue analgesia, IV Paracetamol, in group TD was 10.23±2.42 hours while that in group IV was 8.15±2.48 hours. It was statistically significant(p<0.05). None of our patients required IV tramadol. The mean VAS scores at 2, 4, 6 and 12 hours were lower in group TD in comparison to group IV. There were no significant side effects noted. Conclusion: We can conclude that transdermal diclofenac patch group patients had lower VAS scores at all measured intervals compared to IV diclofenac group and a significantly longer time of rescue analgesic use. Thus, it seems a safe and effective choice for post-operative analgesia in orthopaedic patients.><0.05) None of our patients required IV tramadol. The mean VAS scores at 2, 4, 6 and 12 hours were lower in group TD in comparison to group IV. There were no significant side effects noted.

Conclusion: We can conclude that transdermal diclofenac patch group patients had lower VAS scores at all measured intervals compared to IV diclofenac group and a significantly longer time of rescue analgesic use. Thus, it seems a safe and effective choice for post-operative analgesia in orthopaedic patients.

Key Message: Pre-emptive application of transdermal diclofenac patch in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures provides good analgesia in post-operative period and can reduce requirements of opioids with minimal side effects.
 


Keywords : Hip fractures; Intravenous; NSAIDs; Transdermal
Corresponding Author : Abhinav Sinha