Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 2, Mar-Apr 2020, Pages 540-546
 

Original Article

Comparative Study of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine (0.5 Microgram/ Kg) Vs Intravenous Midazolam (0.05 Mg/Kg) as Premedicant in Spinal Anesthesia with 0.5% Bupivacaine for Gynecological Surgeries

Samba Siva Rao Jupalli, Sathish Kumar Bopparathi

1Associate Professor, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana 500003, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.15

Abstract

 

Introduction: Surgeries like direct and indirect inguinal hernia repair, lower limb surgeries, urological surgeries and gynecological surgeries are commonly done under spinal anesthesia. It is a selective 2-
adrenoceptor agonist and is currently used for its sedative, analgesic and sympatholytic properties. Intravenous Dexmedetomidine decreases the inhalational anesthesia and opioid requirements during general
anesthesia. Aims: To compare the postoperative effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in comparison with intravenous midazolam on intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Prospective randomized study between March 2017 and August 2018. This study was conducted in 100 patients belonging American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification class 1 & 2 and undergoing gynecological surgeries under spinal anesthesia were included. Results: Postoperative analgesia was significantly prolonged with the use of intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication than with intravenous midazolam. Heart rates were lesser in dexmedetomidine Group A when compared to midazolam Group B, but overall requirement of anticholinergics was similar in both groups. Mean
arterial pressures were lower with dexmedetomidine Group A when compared with midazolam Group B. Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blockade during the spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine with good sedation and postoperative analgesia than with intravenous midazolam premedication in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries under spinal anesthesia.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Bupivacaine; Premedication, Spinal anesthesia.
Corresponding Author : Sathish Kumar Bopparathi