Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 3, May-June 2020, Pages 720-725
 

Original Article

Axillary Approach Versus Infraclavicular Approach In Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study

TC Balaraju, Patil Vishalakshi, Kondikar Lohit, Naik Harish S.

1Professor,2Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, 4Postgraduate 3rd Year, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Navodaya Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur, Karnataka 584103, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7320.10

Abstract

Background: Brachial plexus block (BPB) is a well accepted technique to provide anaesthesia and analgesia for upper limb surgeries. Usage of ultrasound (USG) guided BPB technique has overcome the disadvantages caused by traditional landmark technique. Objective: To determine the block performance time, onset time, success rate, and any complications with the USG guided technique in both Axillary and Infraclavicular BPB
Methods: For an ultrasound guided brachial plexus block 80 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgeries were randomly allocated into 2 groups group AX (axillary), Group IC (infraclavicular) to receive Ropivacaine 0.75% 25 ml. Block performance time, onset and duration of sensory and motor block and success rate were
assessed.

Results: The mean block performance time of Group IC (6.43 ± 0.38) was significantly shorter compared to Group AX (8.46 ± 0.43). The mean onset time of sensory block (5.33 ± 1.67 vs 7.03 ± 2.01) and
motor block (9.23 ± 3.01 vs 17.53 ± 4.10) were significantly faster in Group IC compared to Group AX. Duration of sensory block (290.38 ± 78.65 vs 295.25 ± 35.86) and motor block (356 ± 97.99 vs 357.8 ± 108.13). Success rate was (95%) in group IC and (85%) in group AX. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided BPB through infraclavicular
approach has shorter performance time, higher success rate and faster onset of sensory and motor block when compared to axillary approach. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of sensory and motor block in both approaches.


Keywords : Brachial plexus Block, Ropivacaine, Ultrasound.
Corresponding Author : Vishalakshi Patil