This article reviews the UGC notification on regulations Clause 7.3.0 on the appointment of Vice Chancellors in universities. The second sentence of the regulation has certain expressions that can possibly lead to several subjective interpretations resulting in ambiguity. No one can deny that a lot of thinking would have gone into the formulation of the said regulation. But experience has shown that a review is necessary. Expression such as “experience in an equivalent position” demands careful interpretation. Further a few words pertinent in the present context like “post vs position, professorship vs headship, professorship vs membership in the Syndicate” are analyzed for the purpose of bringing better clarity. It is hoped that this article will sensitize some of those in the apex body of higher education which constantly emphasizes transparency and merit in appointment of top officials.